As organizations increasingly rely on technology to drive growth and transformation, it’s critical that IT and business leaders work together to maximize the value of tech spend and ensure it stays closely aligned with enterprise objectives. But in the absence of clearly defined allocation and consumption metrics, business leaders often can’t understand their IT costs or what they’re receiving in return for those costs – causing needless frustration, mistrust, misguided consumption, and wasted resources.
A showback or chargeback model remedies this problem by joining the threads of IT spend, customer consumption, and business capabilities – enabling a more intelligent conversation around how technology resources are distributed and the value they provide.
That said, let’s take a deeper look at the anatomy of a showback or chargeback, how they both work, and what makes them different.
Showbacks and chargebacks are more alike than they are different. From a mathematics and content perspective, they share the exact same structure.
The only tactical difference between showback and chargeback is what they deliver to consumers in your bill of IT – either a report “showing back” costs and consumption, or the same information delivered as an invoice for payment:
Despite the similarity between showback and chargeback on a tactical level, they’re quite different in terms of capabilities. From a strategic perspective, the key differentiator is the degree to which they enable you to drive accountability and guide usage behavior.
Since a showback doesn’t invoice consumers and collect payment, it lacks an enforcement mechanism to encourage consumers to pay attention and be proactive. Unless your consumers are exceptionally thoughtful and conscientious – even when there’s no financial incentive – then a chargeback is likely the only way you’ll be able to stimulate positive change.
As a result, most organizations use showback as a stepping-stone to chargeback. And it’s a smart approach: testing the bill of IT as a showback to work out any kinks, giving consumers time to raise questions and get familiar with the process, and then moving to a chargeback once everything is running smoothly.
Keep in mind though, showback is still a powerful tool for giving business leaders better visibility into costs and consumption, demonstrating the value of IT, and exposing levers to optimize spend. And it’s not uncommon for organizations to delay, or entirely forego, moving to a chargeback after starting with showback and finding it sufficient.
Now that you know the differences between showback and chargeback and what each model can help you accomplish, here’s a simple list of pros and cons to recap what we’ve discussed – and to note a few other important points you should consider.
Just to reiterate, a chargeback is simply a showback plus invoicing. That means a chargeback can drive all the same outcomes as a showback, but it adds the ability to enforce accountability with real invoices and guide usage behavior through strategic pricing.
For organizations with no prior experience generating a bill of IT, a simple showback is the best first step – primarily because it requires minimal setup effort (no new processes or accounting stream integration), and there’s minimal risk if something goes wrong.
Even if you have requirements that dictate chargeback as your ultimate long-term goal, starting with a showback gives you the chance to refine the model and socialize it across the business. That way, everyone will be fully prepared if/when you move to a full chargeback.
For anyone seeking more guidance on the showback or chargeback journey, we’ve created a comprehensive eBook that details every step of the process: “How to Produce an Effective Bill of IT Using Showback or Chargeback.”
Inside, you’ll get a detailed, step-by-step look at how to build a new showback or chargeback process from the ground up — as well as some strategic tips for long-term success.
Nicus is a Premier sponsor at the upcoming 2017 Gartner IT Finance, Procurement, and Asset Management Conference (ITFPAM) in ...Learn More